Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Medardo Escobar-Alfaro v. William Barr, 15-70726 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 15-70726 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MEDARDO ESCOBAR-ALFARO, No. 15-70726 Petitioner, Agency No. A205-847-427 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 4, 2020** Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Medardo Escobar-Alfaro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions p
More
                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 6 2020
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEDARDO ESCOBAR-ALFARO,                          No.   15-70726

                Petitioner,                      Agency No. A205-847-427

 v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

                Respondent.

                     On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                         Board of Immigration Appeals

                              Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before:      FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

      Medardo Escobar-Alfaro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.

      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 
755 F.3d 1026
, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the

petition for review.

      Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Escobar-Alfaro failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See

Zheng v. Holder, 
644 F.3d 829
, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too

speculative); Wakkary v. Holder, 
558 F.3d 1049
, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no

likelihood of torture established).

      PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.




                                         2                                   15-70726

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer