Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernan, 17-17257 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 17-17257 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WALTER JOSEPH COOK III, No. 17-17257 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-06343- WHA SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed September 28, 2020 Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. Order 2 COOK V. KERNAN ORDER Judge Callahan has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge N.R. Smith has voted to deny Appellant’s petition fo
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WALTER JOSEPH COOK III, No. 17-17257 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-06343- WHA SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER Filed September 28, 2020 Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. Order 2 COOK V. KERNAN ORDER Judge Callahan has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge N.R. Smith has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and recommends denying the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Murguia has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). The petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer