Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc., 17-55723 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 17-55723 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 07, 2020
Latest Update: May 07, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 7 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF No. 17-55723 AFRICAN-AMERICAN OWNED MEDIA, a California Limited Liability Company; D.C. No. ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS 2:16-cv-00609-GW-FFM NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation, ORDER* Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Before: SCH
More
                           NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        MAY 7 2020
                                                                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF                         No.    17-55723
AFRICAN-AMERICAN OWNED MEDIA,
a California Limited Liability Company;         D.C. No.
ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS                           2:16-cv-00609-GW-FFM
NETWORKS, INC., a California
corporation,
                                                ORDER*
                Plaintiffs-Appellees,

 v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a
Delaware corporation,

                Defendant-Appellant.

                On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: SCHROEDER, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

      On March 30, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Appellant’s petition for

certiorari, vacated our opinion filed February 4, 2019, and remanded for further

consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African American-

Owned Media, 589 U. S. ___ (2020). We hereby VACATE the district court’s

decision and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with Comcast.


      *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.




                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer