Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Bishop, 2:16-ap-01388-RK. (2017)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California Number: inbco20170804714 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2017
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER POSTPONING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ADVERSARY COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO MEET BURDEN OF PROOF UNTIL TRIAL ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . Pending before the court is the Motion of Defendant Reggie Lyn Bishop to Dismiss Adversary Complaint for Failure to Meet Burden of Proof ("Motion") (Docket No. 84), filed on July 19, 2017. Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion on July 24, 2017 (Docket No. 86). Defendant Reggie L. Bishop represents himself. J
More

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER POSTPONING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ADVERSARY COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO MEET BURDEN OF PROOF UNTIL TRIAL

Pending before the court is the Motion of Defendant Reggie Lyn Bishop to Dismiss Adversary Complaint for Failure to Meet Burden of Proof ("Motion") (Docket No. 84), filed on July 19, 2017. Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion on July 24, 2017 (Docket No. 86). Defendant Reggie L. Bishop represents himself. JoAnne E. Belisle, of the law firm of Campbell & Farahani, LLP, represents Plaintiff Willie Phelps.

Having considered the Motion and the Opposition thereto, the court determines that pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(j)(3), oral argument on the Motion is unnecessary, dispenses with it, vacates the hearing on the Motion noticed for August 15, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. and rules as follows.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(i) states: "If a party so moves, any defense listed in Rule 12(b)(1)-(7)—whether made in a pleading or by motion—and a motion under Rule 12(c) must be heard and decided before trial unless the court orders a deferral until trial." This rule is made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012(b). Under these rules, the court has discretion to postpone a ruling on a motion to dismiss to trial. See O'Connell and Stevenson, Rutter Group Practice Guide: Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial, ¶9:273 at 9-112 (2017), citing, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(i).

Defendant in the Motion seeking dismissal of this adversary proceeding contends that Plaintiff cannot meet its burden of proof in this proceeding, and as such, the court construes the Motion as one to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), made applicable here by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012(b). Since it appears to the court that the Motion raises the same arguments that the court would need to decide at trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(i), made applicable here by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012(b), the court exercises its discretion to postpone its ruling on the Motion to the time of trial. No trial date is yet set in this adversary proceeding, but the court expects to set a trial date at the pretrial conference in this adversary proceeding now scheduled for August 29, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. No appearances are required on August 15, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer