IN RE VALDOVINOS, 2:17-bk-19557-RK. (2017)
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Number: inbco20171011894
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2004 AND 9016 FOR EXAMINATION OF AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM: 1. ALFONSO SPINDOLA VALDOVINOS; AND 2. ISABEL VALDOVINOS [No Hearing Required — LBR 2004-1] ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . Based on the Court's review of the Motion of Creditor Dory Sarafin ("Sarafin"), the Judgment Creditor of Alfonso Spindola Valdovinos ("A. Valdovinos") and Isabel Valdovinos ("I. Val
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2004 AND 9016 FOR EXAMINATION OF AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM: 1. ALFONSO SPINDOLA VALDOVINOS; AND 2. ISABEL VALDOVINOS [No Hearing Required — LBR 2004-1] ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . Based on the Court's review of the Motion of Creditor Dory Sarafin ("Sarafin"), the Judgment Creditor of Alfonso Spindola Valdovinos ("A. Valdovinos") and Isabel Valdovinos ("I. Vald..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2004 AND 9016 FOR EXAMINATION OF AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM: 1. ALFONSO SPINDOLA VALDOVINOS; AND 2. ISABEL VALDOVINOS
[No Hearing Required — LBR 2004-1]
ROBERT KWAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Based on the Court's review of the Motion of Creditor Dory Sarafin ("Sarafin"), the Judgment Creditor of Alfonso Spindola Valdovinos ("A. Valdovinos") and Isabel Valdovinos ("I. Valdovinos") (collectively, the "Debtors") for entry of an order, pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure ("Rule") 2004 and Local Bankruptcy Rule ("LBR") 2004-1, authorizing Sarafin to conduct the oral examinations of the Debtors on November 1, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., in the office of Sarafin's counsel, Goe & Forsythe, LLP, located at 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1200, Irvine, CA 92612, and requiring the Debtors to produce documents requested, as identified in the attached Exhibit "1" ("Production") by October 25, 2017 ("Motion") [Docket No. 17],
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Motion is denied without prejudice because Sarafin failed to serve the motion on the Debtors personally as required by Local Bankruptcy Rule 2004-1(c) as opposed to their counsel. Absent a stipulation consenting to counsel service only, service of the Motion does not meet the requirements of the Local Bankruptcy Rules.
Source: Leagle
