Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Smith, 2:18-ap-01269-RK. (2018)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California Number: inbco20181029451 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . This adversary proceeding came on for a status conference before the court on October 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. As required by the court's order setting initial status conference in this adversary proceeding, filed on August 27, 2018, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, the parties were required to appear at the status conference. Lauren Chee, of the law firm of Thompson Coburn LLP, appe
More

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This adversary proceeding came on for a status conference before the court on October 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. As required by the court's order setting initial status conference in this adversary proceeding, filed on August 27, 2018, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, the parties were required to appear at the status conference. Lauren Chee, of the law firm of Thompson Coburn LLP, appeared for Defendant Charter Communications, Inc. No appearance was made on behalf of Plaintiff Vyronica Lee Smith.

The court dismisses the adversary proceeding without prejudice for two reasons: (1) the court dismisses the adversary proceeding for lack of prosecution by plaintiff in light of her failure to appear at the status conference as required by this court's order setting initial status conference and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1; and (2) the adversary proceeding is procedurally improper because Plaintiff is seeking damages for alleged violations of the automatic stay which must be by motion under 11 U.S.C. §362(k) and/or for civil contempt under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9020 and Local Bankruptcy Rule 9020-1 rather than through an adversary proceeding. In re Goodman, 991 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir. 1993); In re Zumbrum, 88 B.R. 250, 252-253 (9th Cir. BAP 1988).

For the foregoing reasons, this adversary proceeding is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer