In re Smith, 2:18-ap-01269-RK. (2018)
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Number: inbco20181029451
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . This adversary proceeding came on for a status conference before the court on October 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. As required by the court's order setting initial status conference in this adversary proceeding, filed on August 27, 2018, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, the parties were required to appear at the status conference. Lauren Chee, of the law firm of Thompson Coburn LLP, appe
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . This adversary proceeding came on for a status conference before the court on October 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. As required by the court's order setting initial status conference in this adversary proceeding, filed on August 27, 2018, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, the parties were required to appear at the status conference. Lauren Chee, of the law firm of Thompson Coburn LLP, appea..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ROBERT KWAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding came on for a status conference before the court on October 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. As required by the court's order setting initial status conference in this adversary proceeding, filed on August 27, 2018, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, the parties were required to appear at the status conference. Lauren Chee, of the law firm of Thompson Coburn LLP, appeared for Defendant Charter Communications, Inc. No appearance was made on behalf of Plaintiff Vyronica Lee Smith.
The court dismisses the adversary proceeding without prejudice for two reasons: (1) the court dismisses the adversary proceeding for lack of prosecution by plaintiff in light of her failure to appear at the status conference as required by this court's order setting initial status conference and Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1; and (2) the adversary proceeding is procedurally improper because Plaintiff is seeking damages for alleged violations of the automatic stay which must be by motion under 11 U.S.C. §362(k) and/or for civil contempt under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9020 and Local Bankruptcy Rule 9020-1 rather than through an adversary proceeding. In re Goodman, 991 F.2d 613, 620 (9th Cir. 1993); In re Zumbrum, 88 B.R. 250, 252-253 (9th Cir. BAP 1988).
For the foregoing reasons, this adversary proceeding is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle