Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Bodeau, 17-ap-01455-RK. (2018)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California Number: inbco20181119530 Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON DEBTOR'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND/OR PRIVILEGE LOG ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . On September 4, 2018, the Court heard argument on Sandra Bodeau's (Debtors) Motion to Compel Oggi's Pizza and Brewing Company (Plaintiffs) to provide further responses to Debtor's First Set of Requests for Production. After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, and good cause appearing therefore, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: The Court's tentati
More

ORDER ON DEBTOR'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND/OR PRIVILEGE LOG

On September 4, 2018, the Court heard argument on Sandra Bodeau's (Debtors) Motion to Compel Oggi's Pizza and Brewing Company (Plaintiffs) to provide further responses to Debtor's First Set of Requests for Production. After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, and good cause appearing therefore,

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS:

The Court's tentative ruling, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1, is confirmed. Additionally, the $1,625 in sanctions mentioned in the tentative ruling are awarded against Debtor's counsel, Louis H. Altman and Haberbush & Associates, LLP, and not against Debtor personally.

Sanctions shall be paid within 14 days of the date of entry of this order to Plaintiff's counsel, Grant & Kessler, APC, 1331 India Street, San Diego, CA 92101.

Exhibit 1

United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California Los Angeles Judge Robert Kwan, Presiding Courtroom 1675 Calendar Tuesday, September 4, 2018 Hearing Room 1675 2:30 PM 2:17-17761 Paul Bodeau Chapter 11 Adv#: 2:17-01455 Oggi's Pizza and Brewing Company v. Bodeau et al #18.00 Hearing re: Motion to compel production of documents and/or privilege log Docket 16

Tentative Ruling:

Deny defendants' motion to compel production of documents and/or privilege log for the reasons stated by plaintiff in its opposition. The motion is untimely, and it is a violation of the pretrial scheduling order to file the motion well after the discovery cutoff date. The motion could have been filed and heard way before the cutoff date. Award sanctions against defendants in favor of plaintiff of $1,625 representing 5 hours of attorney time at counsel's billing rate of $325 per hour as reasonable attorneys' fees for preparing the opposition to the untimely motion pursuant to FRCP 37(a)(5)(B). Defendants' untimely motion is not substantially justified because it should have been filed to be heard before the discovery cutoff date. However, the court does not award fees for the work before the discovery cutoff date because arguably the need for the work could have been substantially justified by a proper motion to compel if timely filed. Appearances are required on 9/4/18, but counsel may appear by telephone.

Party Information

Debtor(s): Paul Bodeau Represented By Lane K Bogard David R Haberbush Vanessa M Haberbush Louis H Altman Defendant(s): Paul Bodeau Represented By Vanessa M Haberbush Louis H Altman Sandra Bodeau Represented By
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer