Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANCHEZ v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CV 07-5132 GHK(JC). (2012)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20120106736 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE H. KING, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed all of the records herein, and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and accepts the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by remaining defendants the Los Angeles Department of Ge
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GEORGE H. KING, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed all of the records herein, and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and accepts the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by remaining defendants the Los Angeles Department of General Services (the "GSD"), GSD Sergeant Payan and GSD Lieutenant Lopez is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) in favor of defendants the City of Los Angeles, the GSD, GSD Officer Bradley, GSD Officer Santizo, GSD Officer Garcia, GSD Sergeant Payan and GSD Lieutenant Lopez on the merits; and (2) dismissing this action without prejudice as against defendant Los Angeles Police Department Sergeant Landry and the Doe Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on the parties to this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer