CORDERO v. HEMET POLICE DEPARTMENT, CV 10-1935-JAK (PJW). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120113827
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the M..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Source: Leagle
