DeVAUGHN v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CV 08-1461 ABC (FFM). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120120818
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo d
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo de..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
IT IS ORDERED that defendant Option One is dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff's § 1983 claims and without prejudice as to plaintiff's state law claims.
Source: Leagle
