Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MACHADO v. CDCR, CV 08-7034 CAS (SH). (2012)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20120120912 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN J. HILLMAN, District Judge. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his or her own costs, fees and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. The Court will maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER

STEPHEN J. HILLMAN, District Judge.

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his or her own costs, fees and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. The Court will maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer