SPIVEY v. TRIMBLE, CV 09-7502-VBF (DTB). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120202962
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. I
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Petition with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
