OLENICOFF v. UBS AG, SACV08-01029 AG (RNBx). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120413a66
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF UBS AG AND BRADLEY BIRKENFELD ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Defendant UBS AG ("UBS") filed five motions for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Igor Olenicoff and Olen Properties Corp. (collectively "Plaintiffs"). Defendant Bradley Birkenfeld ("Birkenfeld") joined in UBS's motions for summary judgment. On April 10, 2012, the Court entered its order granting UBS's motions for summary judgment 3 and 5 in their entirety, granting in part motions for summary judgment 1 a
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF UBS AG AND BRADLEY BIRKENFELD ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Defendant UBS AG ("UBS") filed five motions for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Igor Olenicoff and Olen Properties Corp. (collectively "Plaintiffs"). Defendant Bradley Birkenfeld ("Birkenfeld") joined in UBS's motions for summary judgment. On April 10, 2012, the Court entered its order granting UBS's motions for summary judgment 3 and 5 in their entirety, granting in part motions for summary judgment 1 an..
More
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF UBS AG AND BRADLEY BIRKENFELD
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Defendant UBS AG ("UBS") filed five motions for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Igor Olenicoff and Olen Properties Corp. (collectively "Plaintiffs"). Defendant Bradley Birkenfeld ("Birkenfeld") joined in UBS's motions for summary judgment. On April 10, 2012, the Court entered its order granting UBS's motions for summary judgment 3 and 5 in their entirety, granting in part motions for summary judgment 1 and 2, vacating motion for summary judgment 4 as moot, and granting Birkenfeld's joinder, thus dismissing all claims against UBS and Birkenfeld. (Dkt. 656.) For the reasons set forth in the Court's April 10, 2012 Order,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants UBS and Birkenfeld on all claims for relief in Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint.
2. Plaintiffs shall take nothing against Defendants UBS and Birkenfeld.
3. UBS and Birkenfeld are the prevailing parties and they shall recover their costs of suit as permitted by Local Rule 54.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
