TIDWELL v. CASH, EDCV 10-1883-AG (RCF). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120504e16
Visitors: 41
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, as well as Petitioner's objections to the Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrat
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, as well as Petitioner's objections to the Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, as well as Petitioner's objections to the Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
