JONES v. HARRINGTON, CV 11-7850-AG (PLA). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120606725
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and petitioner's objections. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order. 3. The clerk shall serve this order
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and petitioner's objections. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order. 3. The clerk shall serve this order a..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and petitioner's objections. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The report and recommendation is adopted.
2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.
3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
Source: Leagle
