MERTA v. AYERST LABS, INC., CV 03-04612 DDP (MANx). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120619773
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 34] DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's failure to file a valid substitution of parties is attributable to excusable neglect. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion is DENIED without prejudice and Plaintiff is instructed to file a motion to substitute Steven Merta for Marcia Jane Merta within thirty (30) days
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 34] DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's failure to file a valid substitution of parties is attributable to excusable neglect. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion is DENIED without prejudice and Plaintiff is instructed to file a motion to substitute Steven Merta for Marcia Jane Merta within thirty (30) days o..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 34]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's failure to file a valid substitution of parties is attributable to excusable neglect. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion is DENIED without prejudice and Plaintiff is instructed to file a motion to substitute Steven Merta for Marcia Jane Merta within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
