DAVIS v. BRADSHAW, EDCV 10-1159-CBM (RNB). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120625672
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. he Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREF
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. he Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFO..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. he Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and (2) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
