LLAMAS v. SunTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., CV 12-04842 DDP (CWx). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120730429
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [Docket No. 4] DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint ("Motion"). Because Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the Motion. Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. Additionally, Lo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [Docket No. 4] DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge. Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint ("Motion"). Because Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the Motion. Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. Additionally, Loc..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT [Docket No. 4]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint ("Motion"). Because Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the Motion.
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion."
The hearing on Defendants' Motion was set for July 23, 2012. Plaintiffs' opposition was therefore due by July 2, 2012. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiffs' failure to oppose as consent to granting the Motion to Dismiss, and GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
