CISNEROS v. HARRINGTON, CV 10-574-DMG (OP). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120802595
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommen
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommend..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
