HUH v. BRAZELTON, CV 12-07390-PA (SH). (2013)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20130626c72
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2013
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition filed her
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition filed here..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition filed herein is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by the United States mail on petitioner and counsel for respondent.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
