Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARRIDO v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, CV12-03825 GAF (RZx). (2013)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20130708719 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GARY A. FEESS, District Judge. On March 11, 2013, Defendant RAYTHEON COMPANY'S Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was ruled on by the Honorable Gary A. Feess in Department 740. After full consideration of the moving and responding papers and all supporting papers, it appears and the court finds that Defendant RAYTHEON COMPANY has shown by admissible evidence and reasonable inferences from admissible evidence that the act
More

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

On March 11, 2013, Defendant RAYTHEON COMPANY'S Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was ruled on by the Honorable Gary A. Feess in Department 740.

After full consideration of the moving and responding papers and all supporting papers, it appears and the court finds that Defendant RAYTHEON COMPANY has shown by admissible evidence and reasonable inferences from admissible evidence that the action has no merit, that Plaintiff has presented no triable issue of fact, and the court orders the following judgment:

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in its entirety in favor of Defendant RAYTHEON COMPANY for the factual and legal reasons set forth in the this Court's "Order Re: Motion For Summary Judgment" dated and filed March 11, 2013, as well as the evidence submitted by the Defendant in support of its Motion. Costs are to be awarded to Defendant pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the amount to be determined by application to the Clerk of the Court.

2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all of the claims, causes of action, and damages alleged in this lawsuit and the entire action is dismissed with prejudice on the merits.

3. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this suit. Defendant is deemed to be the prevailing party for all purposes.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer