Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CASTANEDA v. McEWEN, CV 12-4805-DSF (SH). (2013)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20130712651 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation. The court concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. I
More

ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation. The court concurs with and accepts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Petition filed herein is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by the United States mail on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer