V.C. CHAO RETAILS GROUP v. ExxonMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, 2:12-CV-08935-PA (VBKx). (2013)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20130809774
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge. Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action by and between the parties, the Court hereby orders that plaintiff V.C. Chao Retails Group ("Plaintiff's") claims against Defendants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Circle K Stores Inc. ("Defendants") in this action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Defendants' counter-claims against P
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge. Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action by and between the parties, the Court hereby orders that plaintiff V.C. Chao Retails Group ("Plaintiff's") claims against Defendants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Circle K Stores Inc. ("Defendants") in this action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Defendants' counter-claims against Pl..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action by and between the parties, the Court hereby orders that plaintiff V.C. Chao Retails Group ("Plaintiff's") claims against Defendants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Circle K Stores Inc. ("Defendants") in this action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Defendants' counter-claims against Plaintiff in this action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
