MARGARET A. NAGLE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the parties' Stipulation for Proposed Protective Order Regarding Confidential Discovery Material ("Stipulation") filed on February 4, 2013, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been substantively modified by the Court's deletion of the parties' Statement of Good Cause and amendment of paragraphs 6(e), 11, and 16 of the Stipulation.
The parties are expressly cautioned that the designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential, Subject to Protective Order, or other designation(s) used by the parties, does not, in and of itself, create any entitlement to file such information, document, or thing, in whole or in part, under seal. Accordingly, reference to this Protective Order or to the parties' designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential, Subject to Protective Order, or other designation(s) used by the parties, is wholly insufficient to warrant a filing under seal.
There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. The Court has stricken their good cause statement, because a specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons (see below) for filing under seal,
Further, if sealing is requested in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling reasons, as opposed to good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See
Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Protective Order, in the event that this case proceeds to trial, all information, documents, and things discussed or introduced into evidence at trial will become public and available to all members of the public, including the press, unless sufficient cause is shown in advance of trial to proceed otherwise.
1. Documents, including photographs, drawings, films, videotapes, or other writings, including lists or compilations thereof, answers to interrogatories, responses to other discovery requests, and deposition testimony or discovery by any party in this Litigation are referred to as "Confidential Material." Except as otherwise indicated below, all documents, including photographs, drawings, films, videotapes, or other writings, including lists or compilations thereof, answers to interrogatories, responses to other discovery requests, and deposition testimony designated by the producing party as "Confidential" or "Subject to Protective Order," and which are disclosed or produced to the attorneys for the other parties to this Litigation are Confidential Material and are entitled to Confidential treatment as described below.
2. Confidential Material shall not include (a) advertising materials, (b) materials that on their face show that they have been published to the general public, or (c) documents that have been submitted to any governmental entity without request for Confidential treatment.
3. With respect to deposition testimony, documents may be discussed in deposition, but the attorney making the disclosures shall advise the deponent to whom the materials or information contained therein are to be disclosed, that such materials may be disclosed pursuant to this
4. If at any time during this litigation a party disputes the designation of discovery material as Confidential, the objecting party will notify the designating party in writing of such dispute, and request in writing a conference
5. Confidential Treatment. Confidential Material and any information contained therein shall not be used, shown, disseminated, copied, or in any way communicated to anyone for any purpose whatsoever, except as provided below. Confidential Material may be copied only by the Parties' counsel in this action or by personnel or outside vendors assisting such counsel and only for purposes permitted by this Protective Order, and control and distribution of Confidential Material and copies thereof will be the responsibility of such counsel, who will maintain all written assurances executed by such persons as provided in paragraph 7.
6. Confidential Material and any information contained therein shall be disclosed only to the following persons ("Qualified Persons"):
Confidential Material shall not be disclosed to any other person or entity without the prior written consent of the designating party or order of the Court. Any disclosure shall be only to the extent reasonably necessary for the effective prosecution and defense of the claims in this action. Confidential Material and any information contained therein shall be used by the receiving party or parties solely for the prosecution of this Litigation and shall not be used by the receiving party or parties for any other purpose in any other litigation.
7. Prior to the disclosure of any of the materials or information covered by this
8. The term "copy" as used herein means any photographic, mechanical, or computerized copy or reproduction of any document or thing, or any verbatim transcript, in whole or in part, of such document or thing.
9. To the extent that Confidential Material or information contained therein are used in depositions, such documents or information shall remain subject to the provisions of this
10. Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcribes testimony in this Litigation shall agree that all "Confidential" information designated as such under this
11. Except when the filing under seal is otherwise authorized by statute or federal rule, the parties shall seek the Court's prior approval for the filing under seal of pleadings and other documents containing Protected Material in accordance with the procedures set forth in Local Rule 79-5.1
12. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents or information containing Confidential Information that are not designated "Confidential" shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of a claim for Confidential treatment.
13. Documents unintentionally produced without designation as "Confidential" at any time during this litigation may be retroactively designated by notice in writing of the designated classification applicable to each document by Bates number and by providing replacement copies of such documents with the appropriate designation, unless such documents have already been filed with the Court. Upon receipt of the replacement documents, the receiving party shall thereafter return the documents being replaced to the producing party, such documents shall be treated as "Confidential" from the date written notice of the designation is provided to the receiving party. A person disclosing any materials that are subsequently designated as "Confidential" shall in good faith assist the party making the supplemental designation in retrieving such materials from all recipients not entitled to such materials under the terms of this Protective Order and to prevent further disclosures except as authorized under the terms of this Protective Order. Documents to be inspected shall be treated as "Confidential" during inspection. At the time of copying for the receiving parties, such inspected documents shall be stamped prominently "Confidential" by the producing party.
14. A party's inadvertent production of privileged or Confidential Material or information in this litigation shall not in itself be deemed to waive any claim of attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product protection that might exist with respect to such document or other documents or communications, written or oral, including, without limitation, other communications referred to in the documents produced. Upon request, such inadvertently produced documents, and all copies thereof, shall be sent to the producing party within five (5) days of the date of the request, unless such documents have already been filed with the Court. Furthermore, a party's production shall not be deemed a waiver of any party's right to object for any reason to the admission of any document or thing into evidence, nor shall the production be deemed an admission of its admissibility or relevance. Nothing in this Paragraph shall prejudice the right of any party to seek discovery or communications, documents, and things as to which a claim of attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product has been made.
15. The party or parties receiving Confidential Material shall not under any circumstances sell, offer for sale, advertise, or publicize Confidential Material or any information contained therein.
16. If any party receives a subpoena from any non-party to this Protective Order seeking production or disclosure of Confidential Material, the subpoenaed party shall give notice, as soon as practicable and in no event more than three
17. Any documents produced by a non-party witness in discovery in the Litigation pursuant to subpoena or otherwise may be designated by such non-party as "Confidential" under the terms of this
18. After termination of this Litigation, the provisions of this
19. Within thirty (30) days of termination of this Litigation by dismissal, judgment, or settlement, including any appeals, counsel for the party or parties receiving Confidential Material shall return the Confidential Material, including all copies to counsel for the party or parties disclosing or producing the Confidential Material or alternatively, the parties shall provide certification, under oath
20. This Protective Order shall be binding on any party to this Protective Order or any person having executed the attached Exhibit A. This Protective Order also shall be binding upon the parties and their attorneys, successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, independent contractors, or other persons or organizations over which they have control.
21. If other parties are added to this Litigation, no Confidential Material previously exchanged, produced, or used herein will be disclosed to such other parties or their counsel except upon their
22. This Protective Order is without prejudice to the right of any party to move the Court for an order for good cause shown for protection of Confidential Material sought by or produced through discovery, which protection is different from or in addition to that provided for in this Protective Order, and such right is expressly reserved.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the Protective Order entered in Kobe Falco, Joel Seguin, Alfredo Padilla, and Roberto Galvan v. Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Case No. 13-CV-00686-DDP (MANx), understand its terms, agree to be bound by each of those terms, and agree to submit myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order. Specifically and without limitation upon such terms, I further agree that I will not disseminate, use, or disclose any Confidential Material protected by the Protective Order that I have received and/or reviewed in this case to anyone other than the Qualified Persons defined in Paragraph 6 of the Protective Order.