SEIDLER v. BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., 2:13-cv-06766-RGK-SH. (2014)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20140226844
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER STEPHEN J. HILLMAN, Magistrate Judge. ORDER The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stipulation For Protective Order between Plaintiff Todd Seidler and Defendant BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (the "Stipulated Protective Order"), and good cause appearing for the same, hereby ORDERS as follows: The Stipulated Protective Order shall be and hereby is approved and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER STEPHEN J. HILLMAN, Magistrate Judge. ORDER The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stipulation For Protective Order between Plaintiff Todd Seidler and Defendant BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (the "Stipulated Protective Order"), and good cause appearing for the same, hereby ORDERS as follows: The Stipulated Protective Order shall be and hereby is approved and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
STEPHEN J. HILLMAN, Magistrate Judge.
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stipulation For Protective Order between Plaintiff Todd Seidler and Defendant BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (the "Stipulated Protective Order"), and good cause appearing for the same, hereby ORDERS as follows:
The Stipulated Protective Order shall be and hereby is approved and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full as an Order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
