Filed: Feb. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. On January 6, 2014, this Court granted The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Aura Interactive, Inc., d/b/a The Aura Group, ("Aura") because Aura does not did not infringe as a matter of law U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961, asserted by Interpols Network Inc. ("Interpols"). Thereafter, Interpols and Aura entered into a stipulation under which Interpols agreed to dismiss with prejudice its
Summary: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. On January 6, 2014, this Court granted The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Aura Interactive, Inc., d/b/a The Aura Group, ("Aura") because Aura does not did not infringe as a matter of law U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961, asserted by Interpols Network Inc. ("Interpols"). Thereafter, Interpols and Aura entered into a stipulation under which Interpols agreed to dismiss with prejudice its ..
More
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
On January 6, 2014, this Court granted The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Aura Interactive, Inc., d/b/a The Aura Group, ("Aura") because Aura does not did not infringe as a matter of law U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961, asserted by Interpols Network Inc. ("Interpols").
Thereafter, Interpols and Aura entered into a stipulation under which Interpols agreed to dismiss with prejudice its state-law claim alleging unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. and Aura agreed to dismiss its counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of invalidity of the '017 patent and the '961 patents without prejudice. In accordance with the above-described order and stipulation,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
(1) Judgment is entered in favor of Aura and against Interpols as to the claims of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961 set forth in Interpols's First Amended Complaint and as to Aura's counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement of those patents as set forth in the Answer of Aura;
(2) Interpols's claims against Aura alleging unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. are dismissed, with prejudice;
(3) Aura's counterclaims against Interpols seeking declaratory judgments of invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961 are dismissed, without prejudice; and
(4) Interpols takes nothing by way of its claims asserted against Aura.
(5) Aura, as prevailing party, is entitled to recover its costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), in an amount to be determined and subject to documentation and verification. Interpols reserves the right to object to Aura's bill of costs.
Because no claims are remaining in this action, the Court expressly directs the Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
