GARCIA v. JUNIOUS, CV 11-6761-MMM (AGR). (2014)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20140513f75
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: May 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Petitioner argues that he was charged with kidn
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Petitioner argues that he was charged with kidna..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Petitioner argues that he was charged with kidnapping and the associated crime of evading police. (Objections at 4-7.) Petitioner is incorrect. Petitioner was charged with a kidnapping on January 26, 2007 and was charged separately with resisting an executive officer on January 30, 2007. (Lodged Document 1 at 75-76.)
Petitioner's remaining objections are without merit.
IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
