GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
Having considered the Complaint on file in this action and SHFL entertainment, Inc. ("SHFL") on the one hand, and Casino Italia SRL, ("CIS") on the other (each a "Party," and collectively the "Parties"), and the Parties having consented to the terms of the permanent injunction set forth below, this Court hereby finds as follows:
1. This case arises under the laws of the United States, specifically the patent and trademark laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, and 35 U.S.C. § 271, et seq. This Court has original jurisdiction of this action under 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.
2. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because the claims are so related as to form part of the same case or controversy.
3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over CIS because it solicits, transacts and does business in this District, a substantial part of the wrongful acts or omissions complained of occurred in this District, and CIS is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c).
4. SHFL is, among other things, a manufacturer of casino gaming equipment and licensor of proprietary games, including but not limited to the games at issue: Let It Ride, Three Card Poker, Pair Plus, Casino War and Caribbean Stud (the "games at issue" or "SHFL Games").
5. SHFL is the exclusive owner of all rights to United States Patent No. 6,237,916 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Playing Card Games" (the "'916 Patent"), United States Patent No. 6,698,759 entitled "Player Banked Three Card Poker and Associated Games" (the "'759 Patent"), United States Patent No. 6,345,823 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Playing Card Games" (the "'823 Patent") and United States Patent No. 7,628,689 entitled "Poker Game with Blind Bet and Player Selectable Play Wager" (the "'689 Patent").
6. SHFL owns and extensively uses several trademarks for the games at issue, which are well-known and famous throughout the United States and worldwide, including but not limited to: "Let It Ride," U.S. Trademark Registration Number ("Reg. No.") 2,178,254 ("LET IT RIDE"); the common law trademark rights to the "Three Card Poker" word mark which SHFL has used in interstate commerce in connection with software for the play of card games since at least as early as November 12, 2002 ("THREE CARD POKER"); "Casino War," Reg. No. 1,860,468 and the common law trademark for "Casino War" (collectively, "CASINO WAR"); "Pair Plus," Reg. No. 4,234,994 ("PAIR PLUS"); and "Caribbean Stud," Reg. No. 1,787,117 ("CARIBBEAN STUD").
7. SHFL's patents and trademarks in the SHFL Games are all valid and subsisting and are conclusive evidence of SHFL's ownership of and right to use the inventions, marks and designs shown therein in connection with entertainment services and games.
8. On October 15, 2013, SHFL filed this action against CIS alleging, inter alia, that CIS licenses casino games from ISB Technology Limited and ISB Services Ltd. and also markets, advertises, displays, sells, uses, licenses, leases, and/or distributes same including the games "Let It Ride" (also known as "Let Them Ride"); "Three Card Poker" (also known as "Poker 3 Cards"); "Pair Plus;" "Casino War;" and "Caribbean Stud" (also known as "Caribbean Poker") (collectively, the "Infringing Games").
9. SHFL further alleges that Casino Italia owns and operates the website https://www.casinoitalia.it/to facilitate its infringing conduct, including by displaying and making the Infringing Games available to be played in California and throughout the United States.
10. SHFL has no adequate remedy at law and the alleged harm to SHFL and to the public outweighs the harm to any legitimate interests of CIS.
11. CIS denies all allegations of the Complaint.
12. SHFL, on the one hand, and CIS on the other, desire to avoid the cost and expense of trial and to resolve the referenced disputes in a business-like fashion, but intend that the Court retain continuing jurisdiction in the event of the breach of the separate settlement agreement between SHFL and CIS relating to this case (the "Settlement Agreement") or this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction, or other need for judicial intervention.
In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the parties hereto stipulate and agree to this consent judgment and to the entry of a permanent injunction against CIS in the form set forth below.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: as to there parties
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.