ERVIN v. SOTO, CV 13-2245-JVS (OP). (2014)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20140626872
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the original Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made.
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the original Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. T..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the original Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Final Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
