CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFITURE

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

This civil forfeiture action was commenced on January 6, 2014. Claimant Gregory Toussieng ("Claimant") filed a claim on January 29, 2014. No other claims or answers were filed and the time for filing claims and answers has expired. Plaintiff and Claimant have made a stipulated request for the entry of this consent judgment of forfeiture resolving all claims concerning the defendants $28,553.00 in U.S. currency (Asset ID No. 13-FBI-006296), $2,778.46 in Bank Funds (Asset ID No. 13-FBI-006297), and One 2010 Porsche Panamera (Asset ID No. 13-FBI-006295) ("defendant assets").

The Court has been duly advised of and has considered the matter. Based upon the mutual consent of the parties hereto, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that:

1. The United States of America shall have judgment as to $28,553.00 in U.S. currency and $2,778.46 in Bank Funds, plus all interest earned by the government on the full amount of the defendant currency since seizure, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein.

2. Within 60 days of the entry of the judgment lodged concurrently with this stipulation, Claimant agrees to pay a total of $40,000 as an amount in lieu of forfeiture of the defendant vehicle. Such payment shall be made by cashier's check or money order payable to U.S. Marshals Service and sent to: U.S. Marshals Service, Attn: Glenda Walker, Property Manager, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 2001, Los Angeles, CA 90012. The cashier's check or money order should include the Asset ID No. 13-FBI-006295. If Claimant fails to make the payment as and when required by this paragraph, he shall be deemed to have waived all of his right, title, claims and interest in and to the defendant vehicle and consents to the administrative forfeiture of the defendant vehicle without further notice. Upon completion of the payment specified above, the U.S. Marshals Service shall return the defendant vehicle to Claimant.

3. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the defendant assets and the institution of this action. This consent judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs in connection with the seizure, retention and return of the defendant assets.