RADEMAKER v. EVANS, CV 08-8486-VAP(CW). (2014)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20141127458
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation, the Corrected Report and Recommendation, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation, the Corrected Report and Recommendation, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which o..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation, the Corrected Report and Recommendation, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made. The court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
