Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CEIVA LOGIC, INC. v. FRAME MEDIA, INC., SACV-08-636-JVS (RNBx). (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20150109487 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC. JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc. ("DSS") and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over DSS. 2. This Court has subject matter of this action brought by Plaintiff, Ceiva Logic, Inc. ("Ceiva"). 3. Ceiva is the
More

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc. ("DSS") and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over DSS. 2. This Court has subject matter of this action brought by Plaintiff, Ceiva Logic, Inc. ("Ceiva"). 3. Ceiva is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to United States Patent No. 6,442,573 ("the `573 patent"), including all rights of recovery for infringement thereof. 4. DSS has infringed the `573 patent. 5. Ceiva has been irreparably damaged by the actions of DSS and will continue to be irreparably damaged by the actions of the DSS unless DSS is permanently enjoined by this Court from infringement of the `573 patent. 6. DSS, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, receivers, trustees and other fiduciaries and all other persons in active participation with them are, therefore, permanently enjoined during the life of the `573 patent from any and all acts of infringement of the `573 patent, including, but not limited to, making, having made, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United States the invention claimed in the `573 patent. 7. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, this is an "exceptional case", and Ceiva is awarded its reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount to be determined by this Court at the time Ceiva's request for fees is considered. 8. Pursuant to FRCP 54(d)(1), Ceiva is awarded costs of suit in an amount to be fixed by the Court. 9. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of this Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer