SUI v. MARSHACK, SACV 13-1607 JAK (AJW). (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20150414678
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and plaintiffs' objections to the Report. [ See Docket Nos. 125, 128]. Good cause appearing, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed. IT IS SO OR
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and plaintiffs' objections to the Report. [ See Docket Nos. 125, 128]. Good cause appearing, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed. IT IS SO ORD..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and plaintiffs' objections to the Report. [See Docket Nos. 125, 128]. Good cause appearing, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
