Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HARDIE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CV14-4633RGK(AJWx). (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20150504791 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED ORDER] RE: DISMISSAL R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . THE PARTIES HERETO, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, James R. Hardie stipulate and request that the above-captioned action, with regards to his claims alleged in the Complaint, filed with the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. CV14-4633RGK(JEMx)), against Defendant City
More

[PROPOSED ORDER] RE: DISMISSAL

THE PARTIES HERETO, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, James R. Hardie stipulate and request that the above-captioned action, with regards to his claims alleged in the Complaint, filed with the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. CV14-4633RGK(JEMx)), against Defendant City of Los Angeles, et al be dismissed with prejudice entirely. Each party shall be responsible for bearing its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the above-referenced lawsuit.

No parties remain in this action.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the present action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer