UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF TECH STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, CV 14-6622 DSF (AGRx). (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20150810855
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 28) Defendants' motion to dismiss was filed on July 23, 2015 with a hearing date of August 24, 2015. Plaintiff's opposition was due on August 3, 2015. No opposition has been filed. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for August 24, 2015 is removed from the Court's c
Summary: MEMORANDUM DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 28) Defendants' motion to dismiss was filed on July 23, 2015 with a hearing date of August 24, 2015. Plaintiff's opposition was due on August 3, 2015. No opposition has been filed. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for August 24, 2015 is removed from the Court's ca..
More
MEMORANDUM
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 28)
Defendants' motion to dismiss was filed on July 23, 2015 with a hearing date of August 24, 2015. Plaintiff's opposition was due on August 3, 2015. No opposition has been filed. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing set for August 24, 2015 is removed from the Court's calendar.
The Court deems the lack of opposition to be consent to the motion. L.R. 7-12; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52 (9th Cir. 1995); Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652 (9th Cir. 1994).
The motion to DISMISS is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
