Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nichols v. City of Palm Springs, EDCV14-01553 PSG (ASx). (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20151102834 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge . On October 6, 2014, this Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, dismissing the claim alleged against it with leave to amend, specifically stating that if Plaintiffs MICHAEL NICHOLS, MINDY NICHOLS, and GEORGIA NICHOLS did not timely amend the dismissal would be with prejudice. Plaintiffs did not amend their complaint such that the claim for which leave to amend was given was deemed dismissed.
More

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

On October 6, 2014, this Court granted the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, dismissing the claim alleged against it with leave to amend, specifically stating that if Plaintiffs MICHAEL NICHOLS, MINDY NICHOLS, and GEORGIA NICHOLS did not timely amend the dismissal would be with prejudice. Plaintiffs did not amend their complaint such that the claim for which leave to amend was given was deemed dismissed.

On October 21, 2015, this Court granted the motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants GUILLERMO FERNANDEZ, MATT BEARD and RAE FERNANDEZ, as employees of CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, a public entity, in its entirety.

All claims having been adjudicated in favor of Defendants,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs MICHAEL NICHOLS, MINDY NICHOLS, and GEORGIA NICHOLS shall take nothing by way of their complaint against Defendants CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, GUILLERMO FERNANDEZ, MATT BEARD and RAE FERNANDEZ. Said Defendants shall recover from Plaintiffs their costs of suit incurred in this proceeding.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer