Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. SEXTON, 10-cr-923-SJO. (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160105c75 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 (a) (6); 18 U.S.C. 3143 (a)] ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON , Magistrate Judge . The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [ probation ] [supervised release]; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S
More

ORDER OF DETENTION [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 (a) (6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (a)]

The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and

The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a),

The Court finds that:

A. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on Failure to interview writ Pretrial Services, lack of known bail resources, lack of stable resudence or employment, and submission to detention. _____________________________________________________________________________

and/or

B. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on: Refusal to interview with PSA, allegations in changing document, prior convictions and submission to detentions. _________________________________________________________________________

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer