U.S. v. SILLAS, 2:08-cr-00688-GW-39. (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160121d24
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143(a)] ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON , Magistrate Judge . The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a) (6) and 18 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143(a)] ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON , Magistrate Judge . The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a) (6) and 18 U.S.C. 3..
More
ORDER OF DETENTION
[Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)]
ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and
The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a) (6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (a),
The Court finds that:
A. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on defendant's submission of detention, no continued sureties ______________________________________________________________________ and/or
B. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on: defendant's submission to detention, criminal history, nature of current allegations ____________________________________________________________________
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.
Source: Leagle
