U.S. v. BURUM, CR 05-00547-SJO. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160210928
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/ Supervised Release Conditions) SUZANNE H. SEGAL , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release, The court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure: (A) (X) the appearance of defendant as required; and/or (B) (X) the safety of any person or the com
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/ Supervised Release Conditions) SUZANNE H. SEGAL , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release, The court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure: (A) (X) the appearance of defendant as required; and/or (B) (X) the safety of any person or the comm..
More
ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/ Supervised Release Conditions)
SUZANNE H. SEGAL, Magistrate Judge.
On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release,
The court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure:
(A) (X) the appearance of defendant as required; and/or
(B) (X) the safety of any person or the community.
The court concludes:
A. (x) Defendant poses a risk to the safety of other persons or the community because defendant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that:
he will comply w/conditions. Defendants positive drug tests and failures to report w/criminal history, present risk to safety and orders
(B) (x) Defendant is a flight risk because defendant has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that:
He will comply w/ Conditions. also, he is a flight risk due to substance abuse and lock of bail resources.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
