Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ACEVEDO, 2:10-CR-00241-RGK-13. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160420c41 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING [Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143(a)] KAREN L. STEVENSON , Magistrate Judge . The defendant having been arrested in this district pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation of the terms and conditions of his supervised release; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. 3143(a), The Co
More

ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING

[Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. 3143(a)]

The defendant having been arrested in this district pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violation of the terms and conditions of his supervised release; and

The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a),

The Court finds that:

A. (X) The defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on his failure to proffer any evidence to meet his burden on this issue;

and

B. (X) The defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on his failure to proffer any evidence to meet his burden on this issue.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer