U.S. v. PHILLIPS, 16-CR-0113-MWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160425515
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (18 U.S.C. 3148(b): Allegations of Violation of Pretrial Conditions of Release) ROZELLA A. OLIVER , Magistrate Judge . On motion of the Government involving an alleged violation of conditions of pretrial release, and a warrant for arrest, The Court finds there is: [x] clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated a condition of release; [x] Based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g), there is no condition or combination of co
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (18 U.S.C. 3148(b): Allegations of Violation of Pretrial Conditions of Release) ROZELLA A. OLIVER , Magistrate Judge . On motion of the Government involving an alleged violation of conditions of pretrial release, and a warrant for arrest, The Court finds there is: [x] clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated a condition of release; [x] Based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g), there is no condition or combination of con..
More
ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (18 U.S.C. § 3148(b): Allegations of Violation of Pretrial Conditions of Release)
ROZELLA A. OLIVER, Magistrate Judge.
On motion of the Government involving an alleged violation of conditions of pretrial release, and a warrant for arrest,
The Court finds there is:
[x] clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated a condition of release;
[x] Based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety or any other person or the community.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending trial.
Source: Leagle
