Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aventis Pharma SA, EDCV-09-0023 MJG. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160505747
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED MARVIN J. GARBIS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Re: Potential Sanctions issued herewith: 1. Plaintiff Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Jan Weir, Esquire shall file a document showing cause why sanctions should not be imposed on them in regard to the evidentiary hearing held July 7-10, 2014, particularly: a. Misleading the Court to believe that certain exhibits were true and complete copies of original documents in counse
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED MARVIN J. GARBIS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Re: Potential Sanctions issued herewith: 1. Plaintiff Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Jan Weir, Esquire shall file a document showing cause why sanctions should not be imposed on them in regard to the evidentiary hearing held July 7-10, 2014, particularly: a. Misleading the Court to believe that certain exhibits were true and complete copies of original documents in counsel..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
MARVIN J. GARBIS, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Order Re: Potential Sanctions issued herewith:
1. Plaintiff Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Jan Weir, Esquire shall file a document showing cause why sanctions should not be imposed on them in regard to the evidentiary hearing held July 7-10, 2014, particularly:
a. Misleading the Court to believe that certain exhibits were true and complete copies of original documents in counsel's and/or Amphastar's possession when Mr. Weir knew that the exhibits were not true and complete copies.
b. Utilizing and referring to certain exhibits as if they were, contrary to facts known to Mr. Weir, true and complete copies of original documents.
c. Failing to advise the Court during the testimony of an Amphastar witness, that an exhibit referred to, DX 22, had a blank space that was not blank in the original in counsel's possession but contained relevant information.
2. The said document shall not incorporate prior submissions by reference.
3. The date for filing the said document shall be set by further Order.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
