Filed: May 05, 2016
Latest Update: May 05, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . It is hereby ADJUDGED and DECREED THAT: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all parties to the action, including all members of the class it certified on December 19, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), consisting of "all persons in California who, as adult smokers, were assigned registration numbers by RJR, collected C-Notes, and held C-Notes as of October
Summary: [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . It is hereby ADJUDGED and DECREED THAT: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all parties to the action, including all members of the class it certified on December 19, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), consisting of "all persons in California who, as adult smokers, were assigned registration numbers by RJR, collected C-Notes, and held C-Notes as of October ..
More
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.
It is hereby ADJUDGED and DECREED THAT:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over all parties to the action, including all members of the class it certified on December 19, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), consisting of "all persons in California who, as adult smokers, were assigned registration numbers by RJR, collected C-Notes, and held C-Notes as of October 1, 2006," but excluding "(1) the Judges presiding over the Actions, and members of their families; (2) the Defendant, its subsidiaries, parent companies, successors, predecessors, and any entity in which the Defendant or its parents have a controlling interest and their current or former officers, directors, and employees; and (3) any person that opted out of the class that the Court certified on December 19, 2014."
2. Pursuant to the settlement reached by the parties, this Court hereby dismisses this action on the merits and with prejudice.
3. This Court hereby directs entry of this judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 based upon the Court's finding that there is no just reason for delay of enforcement or appeal of this judgment, notwithstanding the Court's retention of jurisdiction to oversee implementation and enforcement of the settlement agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
