ROSENHAUS v. JACKSON, CV 14-3154-MWF (JCGx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160512662
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 11, 2016
Latest Update: May 11, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT VACATING ARBITRATION AWARD MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . The regularly noticed Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (the "Petition") filed by Petitioner Drew Rosenhaus, and the Cross-Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award (the "Cross-Petition") filed by Respondent DeSean Jackson, came before the Court. Having considered all of the pleadings and arguments submitted by the parties in connection with the Petition and Cross-Petition, the pleadings and papers on file, and any
Summary: JUDGMENT VACATING ARBITRATION AWARD MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . The regularly noticed Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (the "Petition") filed by Petitioner Drew Rosenhaus, and the Cross-Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award (the "Cross-Petition") filed by Respondent DeSean Jackson, came before the Court. Having considered all of the pleadings and arguments submitted by the parties in connection with the Petition and Cross-Petition, the pleadings and papers on file, and any o..
More
JUDGMENT VACATING ARBITRATION AWARD
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
The regularly noticed Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (the "Petition") filed by Petitioner Drew Rosenhaus, and the Cross-Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award (the "Cross-Petition") filed by Respondent DeSean Jackson, came before the Court. Having considered all of the pleadings and arguments submitted by the parties in connection with the Petition and Cross-Petition, the pleadings and papers on file, and any oral and/or documentary evidence presented at the time of hearing, the Court DENIED the Petition and GRANTED the Cross-Petition. (Docket No. 78).
Consistent with the Court's ruling on the Petition and the Cross-Petition and pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be entered in this action as follows:
1. The Arbitration Award entered by Roger Kaplan, on April 10, 2014, is vacated.
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent.
3. Costs are awarded to Respondent as provided by law.
Source: Leagle
