U.S. v. MEDINA, 13-0014-JAK. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160513862
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions) ROZELLA A. OLIVER , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release, The Court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure: [x] the appearance of defendant as required; and/or [x] the safety of any person or the community.
Summary: ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions) ROZELLA A. OLIVER , Magistrate Judge . On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release, The Court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure: [x] the appearance of defendant as required; and/or [x] the safety of any person or the community. ..
More
ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING (Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions)
ROZELLA A. OLIVER, Magistrate Judge.
On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release,
The Court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure:
[x] the appearance of defendant as required; and/or
[x] the safety of any person or the community.
The Court concludes:
[x] Defendant poses a risk to the safety of other persons or the community, and the Court finds that defendant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he does not pose such a risk. The risk to the safety of other persons or the community is based on:
• Instant allegations in violation petition.
• Criminal history.
[x] Defendant is a risk of flight, and the Court finds that defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not such a risk. The risk of flight is based on:
• Instant allegations in violation petition.
• Prior violation and revocation of supervised release in December 2014.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained.
Source: Leagle
