COLONY COVE PROPERTIES, LLC v. CITY OF CARSON, CV 14-03242 PSG (PJWx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160517677
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: [ PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 54] PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge On April 28, 2014, Plaintiff Colony Cove Properties, LLC commenced this action against Defendants City of Carson and City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board seeking damages and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for a regulatory taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Beginning on April 28, 2016, Plaintiff's claim for relief
Summary: [ PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 54] PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge On April 28, 2014, Plaintiff Colony Cove Properties, LLC commenced this action against Defendants City of Carson and City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board seeking damages and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for a regulatory taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Beginning on April 28, 2016, Plaintiff's claim for relief ..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 54]
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge
On April 28, 2014, Plaintiff Colony Cove Properties, LLC commenced this action against Defendants City of Carson and City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board seeking damages and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a regulatory taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Beginning on April 28, 2016, Plaintiff's claim for relief was tried to a jury. On May 5, 2016, the jury duly rendered a unanimous verdict in Plaintiff's favor. (Dkt. No. 194.) Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
1. That Defendants City of Carson's and City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board's (collectively, "Defendants") decisions with respect to Plaintiff Colony Cove Properties, LLC's ("Plaintiff") rent-increase application submitted in September 2007 constituted a regulatory taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution;
2. That Defendants' decisions with respect to Plaintiff's rent-increase application submitted in September 2008 constituted a regulatory taking without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution;
3. That Plaintiff recover $3,336,056 in damages, jointly and severally, from Defendants; and
4. That Plaintiff may file any attorneys' fees motion and/or application for costs in accordance with Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
