Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. TRINGHAM, CR 09-490 SJO. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160608618 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONCERNING RESOLUTION OF COUNT 11 (FORFEITURE) S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . The court, having reviewed the GOVERNMENT'S REPORT CONCERNING RESOLUTION OF COUNT 11 (FORFEITURE), ORDERS that Count 11 was finally resolved by the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (docket no. 100) and the Judgment and Commitment Order (docket no. 180). IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER CONCERNING RESOLUTION OF COUNT 11 (FORFEITURE)

The court, having reviewed the GOVERNMENT'S REPORT CONCERNING RESOLUTION OF COUNT 11 (FORFEITURE), ORDERS that Count 11 was finally resolved by the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (docket no. 100) and the Judgment and Commitment Order (docket no. 180).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer