RUIZ v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 2:14-CV-06388-MRW. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160621891
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION MICHAEL R. WILNER , Magistrate Jugde . HAVING DULY CONSIDERED the Parties' positions regarding whether the Court should retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law, the Court has determined it shall not retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining causes of action arising
Summary: ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION MICHAEL R. WILNER , Magistrate Jugde . HAVING DULY CONSIDERED the Parties' positions regarding whether the Court should retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law, the Court has determined it shall not retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining causes of action arising u..
More
ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION
MICHAEL R. WILNER, Magistrate Jugde.
HAVING DULY CONSIDERED the Parties' positions regarding whether the Court should retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law, the Court has determined it shall not retain Supplemental Jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining causes of action that arise under California state law;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining causes of action arising under California state law (Negligence; Assault and Battery; and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his state law causes of action in California State Superior Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
