Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

COLMERY-PINKERTON v. CARRASCO, 13-CV-1928-JFW (PLAx). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160627411 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . This action came to trial on June 14, 2016, through June 15, 2016 in the above-entitled court, Courtroom 16, the Honorable John F. Walter presiding. L. David Russell, Mara R. Ludmer, and Peter Goldschmidt of Jenner & Block LLP appeared as attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton. Stephanie J. Tanada and Arthur K. Cunningham of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP appeared as attorneys for Defendant Deputy Joshua Carrasco. Trial commenced on
More

JUDGMENT

This action came to trial on June 14, 2016, through June 15, 2016 in the above-entitled court, Courtroom 16, the Honorable John F. Walter presiding. L. David Russell, Mara R. Ludmer, and Peter Goldschmidt of Jenner & Block LLP appeared as attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton. Stephanie J. Tanada and Arthur K. Cunningham of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP appeared as attorneys for Defendant Deputy Joshua Carrasco.

Trial commenced on June 14, 2016. A jury of eight members was empaneled, witnesses were called and testified, evidence was admitted, and the jury instructed. On June 15, 2016, the jury returned a verdict, filed redacted as Court Document No. 179 and unredacted as Court Document No. 182.

As to Plaintiff Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton's claim of improper detention, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that the defendant did not detain the plaintiff without probable cause.

As to Plaintiff Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton's claim of excessive force, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that the defendant did not use unreasonable force on the plaintiff.

As to Plaintiff Lisa Colmery-Pinkerton's claim of improper search, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that the defendant's search of the plaintiff was not unreasonable.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

That final judgment be entered in favor of defendant Joshua Carrasco. Plaintiff shall take nothing by reason of her complaint.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer