ARMENTA v. BEARD, CV 15-00415 DOC (RAO). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160630923
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistra
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrat..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
